When we are dealing with the counting numbers — 1, 2, 3, and so on — it is easy to rank them in order. One is the first counting number, two is the second counting number, and three is the third. We don’t have to worry about mixing up the value of a number — its *cardinality* — with the order in which it arrives — its *ordinality* — since they are essentially the same thing. For years, this was the state of affairs, and everybody was happy. But as zero came into the fold, the neat relationship between a number’s cardinality and its ordinality was ruined. The numbers went 0, 1, 2, 3: zero came first, one was second in line, and two was in third place (*i.e.* 0 has a cardinal value of 0 and an ordinal value of 1; 1 has a cardinal value of 1 and an ordinal value of 2; 2 has a cardinal value of 2 and an ordinal value of 3). No longer were cardinality and ordinality interchangeable.

— *Zero, the Biography of a Dangerous Idea* by Charles Seife

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

This entry was posted on December 6, 2007 at 7:09 am and is filed under Charles Seife, Zero, Cardinality, Ordinality, Zero the Biography of a Dangerous Idea. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

## Leave a Reply