Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

Yesterday I listened to physicist Lawrence Krauss from Case Western University speak.  He said:

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

For example, there is no evidence of God, but that does not allow us to conclude that there is no God.  That is, the absence of evidence for God is not evidence of the absence of God.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: